It is often thought that an appeal to the Court of Appeal will lead to the resolution of a dispute, but in some cases, the Court will merely decide that another hearing is necessary.
In a recent case, the Court heard an appeal concerning a boundary dispute involving land in the Isle of Wight countryside. In simple terms, the question at issue was whether the line of a hedge (which had subsequently been replaced by a fence) or a ditch (which ran part of the way between the properties) represented the true boundary.
The Recorder hearing the case had declined to give consideration to a 1915 deed containing a plan. He concluded that the ditch marked the boundary, even though it was dug after the hedge was created. A further issue regarding adverse possession (‘squatters’ rights’) had not been considered by the Recorder and the result was an appeal to the Court of Appeal.
In the circumstances, the Court made no decision but remitted the case for a new trial so that all the relevant factors could be considered.
New Hearing Needed to Resolve Boundary Dispute
This is another case in which the costs of the dispute are likely to exceed many times over the value of the land under dispute. The value of the land is negligible, but the costs of the litigation have already exceeded £100,000.
The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.
